Em eye doin' it rite?
Credit goes to ScorpionSoldier and Roarshark for assorted renders, BW and Spiner_ for there help in the WIP, and to all the little people.
I think it'd have worked better if you used Sackboys/girls from the sequel, instead of DLC for the first. Heck, I don't think Sephiroth was ever actually released.
This has potential, but it looks unfinished to me. It's probably intentional, but I'd have liked to see a synopsis for the game, without it looks empty. Another thing, why is the spine so thick?
#3, I had no idea there was a difference in the Sackpeople, as I'm unfamiliar with LBP. Also, any text that was of reasonable size didn't fit anywhere. I put a lot of thought into it and decided to dub it a Special Edition (hence the spine), so it wouldn't need a synopsis outright.
Em eye doin' it rite?
Credit goes to ScorpionSoldier and Roarshark for assorted renders, BW and Spiner_ for there help in the WIP, and to all the little people.
[ Reply ]
You should 3-D that flat thing.
[ Reply ]
I think it'd have worked better if you used Sackboys/girls from the sequel, instead of DLC for the first. Heck, I don't think Sephiroth was ever actually released.
This has potential, but it looks unfinished to me. It's probably intentional, but I'd have liked to see a synopsis for the game, without it looks empty. Another thing, why is the spine so thick?
[ Reply ]
wow awesome box man fav from me
have a look at mine
tell me what you think of it
[ Reply ]
the sack is back? BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
[ Reply ]
#3, I had no idea there was a difference in the Sackpeople, as I'm unfamiliar with LBP. Also, any text that was of reasonable size didn't fit anywhere. I put a lot of thought into it and decided to dub it a Special Edition (hence the spine), so it wouldn't need a synopsis outright.
[ Reply ]
I actually really like the design of this, and it's a damn shame that it only has five faves.
[ Reply ]
#7, Then why don't you set an example and fav it? (at the time I posted this, he hadn't) Great job on this sharp, fun-filled box.
[ Reply ]